Notwithstanding that the decision in the Davis case (94 DTC 1934, [1994] 2 CTC 2033) was not appealed by RC, it does not interpret s. 160 as containing a solvency test (i.e., the transferor of property does not have to be insolvent for the provision to be operable), and RC further is of the view that dividends are not normally issued for consideration.