Income Tax Severed Letters - 2024-07-31

Ruling

Principal Issues: 1) Whether subsection 84(2) applies to the proposed transactions. 2) Whether subsection 245(2) applies to the proposed transactions.

Position: 1) No. Favourable ruling given. 2) No.

Reasons: Based on the provisions of the Act, jurisprudence, and CRA publications.

Technical Interpretation - External

Unedited CRA Tags: 
20(1)(l), 50(1), 201 of the Income Tax Regulations

Principal Issues: (1) Is there a T5 reporting requirement for a corporation that operates an online peer-to-peer lending platform? (2) Can lenders participating in peer-to-peer lending deduct amounts in respect doubtful or uncollectible loans?

Position: General comments only.

Reasons: Determinations will depend on facts and legal effects of transactions entered into by the parties involved in the arrangements.

Unedited CRA Tags: 
125(1), 125(5.1), 125(7) “active asset”, "adjusted aggregate investment income", 129(4) "aggregate investment income"

2 May 2024 External T.I. 2024-1003831E5 - Active assets - intangible assets -- attach -- Active Asset

Ensite test is applicable in determining whether goodwill is an “active asset”

Would intangible assets of an active business carried on by a corporation, such as goodwill, customer list, licenses, franchises and quotas, be...

The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.

Principal Issues: Whether intangible assets of an active business carried on by a corporation, such as goodwill, customer list, licenses, franchises and quotas would be “active assets” as defined in subsection 125(7) of the Income Tax Act.

Position: Whether a particular asset is used principally in an active business is a question of fact, which must be determined with reference to the circumstances of the case under review. The relevant circumstances include the actual use to which the asset is put in the course of the business, the nature of the business and the practice in the particular industry. If the withdrawal of the property would have a decidedly destabilizing effect on the corporate operations, the property would generally be considered to be used in the course of carrying on a business.

Reasons: Position based on previous ITRD positions and the decision in Ensite Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen.