Income Tax Severed Letters - 2023-12-06

Ruling

Unedited CRA Tags: 
248(1) "disposition"; 96

2023 Ruling 2022-0950461R3 - Continuation of a Bermudian LP to a Delaware LP -- attach -- Disposition

the domestication of an exempted Bermuda limited partnership under the DRULPA does not entail dispositions
Background

The Partnership is an exempted limited partnership under the Exempted Partnership Act 1992 (Bermuda) (the “EPA”), the Limited...

The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 96 Bermuda partnership that was domesticated under the DRULPA continued as a partnership 90

2023 Ruling 2022-0950461R3 - Continuation of a Bermudian LP to a Delaware LP -- attach -- Section 96

Bermuda partnership that was domesticated under the DRULPA continued as a partnership

Regarding the “domestication” of an exempted Bermuda limited partnership to become a limited partnership governed by the Delaware Revised...

The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 248 - Subsection 248(1) - Disposition the domestication of an exempted Bermuda limited partnership under the DRULPA does not entail dispositions 401

Principal Issues: Whether a limited partnership (“the Partnership”) will continue to be treated as a partnership for purposes of the Act after the continuation. Whether the continuation will result in the partners to have a disposition of their Units. Whether the continuation will result in a disposition of properties by the Partnership.

Position: Yes. No. No.

Reasons: After the continuation, the characteristics of the Partnership more closely resemble partnerships formed in Canada than any other form of business entity or arrangement. The continuation will not result in a disposition given that the Partnership will continue being the same partnership following the continuation from both a Bermuda and Delaware law perspective, and there will be no significant change in the rights and obligations of the partners.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

Unedited CRA Tags: 
15(1), 15(2), 215(6).

21 June 2023 Internal T.I. 2017-0720181I7 - Application of 15(2) and 215(6) -- attach -- Paragraph 214(3)(a)

no application of s. 214(3)(a) to Canco's conferral of a benefit on a non-resident sister by bearing the Part XIII tax on a royalty paid to it

Canco was assessed for and paid Part XIII tax regarding royalty payments that it made to its non-resident parent (Parentco) and to a non-resident...

The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 56 - Subsection 56(2) no s. 56(2) or 15(1) benefit from the conferral by Canco of a benefit on a non-resident sister by bearing the Part XIII tax on a royalty paid to it 235

21 June 2023 Internal T.I. 2017-0720181I7 - Application of 15(2) and 215(6) -- attach -- Subsection 56(2)

no s. 56(2) or 15(1) benefit from the conferral by Canco of a benefit on a non-resident sister by bearing the Part XIII tax on a royalty paid to it

Canco was assessed for and paid Part XIII tax regarding royalty payments that it made to its non-resident parent (Parentco) and to a non-resident...

The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 214 - Subsection 214(3) - Paragraph 214(3)(a) no application of s. 214(3)(a) to Canco's conferral of a benefit on a non-resident sister by bearing the Part XIII tax on a royalty paid to it 250

Principal Issues: Whether a debt is created for the purposes of subsection 15(2) in circumstances where Part XIII tax is assessed in respect of a payment made by a Canadian-resident corporation to a non-resident person, and paid by the Canadian-resident corporation on behalf of the non-resident person under subsection 215(6).

Position: No.

Reasons: Consistent with prior published position.

Unedited CRA Tags: 
2(3), (6)(1)(c), 115(1)(a); 248(1) “office”; 153(1)(a), ITR 10

17 December 2018 Internal T.I. 2016-0659031I7 F - Attendance of board of directors meeting by phone -- attach -- Subparagraph 115(1)(a)(i)

participation in Canadian board meetings by telephone from outside Canada is not the exercise of the office in Canada

Regarding non-resident directors who participate outside Canada and by telephone at board meetings of a resident corporation held in Canada, the...

The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Income Tax Regulations - Regulation 104 - Subsection 104(2) no withholding on non-resident directors’ fees from duties not exercised in Canada 95

17 December 2018 Internal T.I. 2016-0659031I7 F - Attendance of board of directors meeting by phone -- attach -- Subsection 104(2)

no withholding on non-resident directors’ fees from duties not exercised in Canada

After indicating that the participation in Canadian board meetings by telephone from outside Canada would generally not constitute the exercise of...

The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 115 - Subsection 115(1) - Paragraph 115(1)(a) - Subparagraph 115(1)(a)(i) participation in Canadian board meetings by telephone from outside Canada is not the exercise of the office in Canada 109

Principal Issues: Is a non-resident director who, while physically outside of Canada, participates, by phone, in a board meeting held in Canada, considered to be performing duties of offices and employments in Canada?

Position: To the extent that the duties of offices and employments are performed outside of Canada, they should not be taxable income earned in Canada.

Reasons: Duties of offices and employments which are performed outside of Canada by a non-resident are not subject to tax under subparagraph 115(1)(a)(i).