Submitted by narmstrong on Mon, 04/30/2018 - 15:57
sequential split-up butterfly with 1% tolerance, triggering of capital gains to generate CDA and RDTOH, and year end change to accommodate RDTOH division
Background
DC1 holds cash and cash-like assets (e.g., money market funds or GICs), marketable securities and has an RDTOH and CDA balance. Its...
The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.
sequential split-up butterfly with 1% tolerance, triggering of capital gains to generate CDA and RDTOH, and year end change to accommodate RDTOH division
sequential split-up butterfly with 1% tolerance, triggering of capital gains to generate CDA and RDTOH, and year end change to accommodate RDTOH division
sequential split-up butterfly with 1% tolerance, triggering of capital gains to generate CDA and RDTOH, and year end change to accommodate RDTOH division
Submitted by narmstrong on Fri, 04/06/2018 - 02:28
an arrangement which eliminates all risk of loss nonetheless “appears” not to be a synthetic disposition arrangement if there is 20% profits participation
Ten months after the formation by him of a small business corporation, Mr. A agrees with an arm’s length employee of the corporation to sell 1/3...
The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.
an arrangement which eliminates all risk of loss nonetheless “appears” not to be a synthetic disposition arrangement if there is 20% profits participation
264
Principales Questions: Whether subsection 80.6(1) will apply to the scenario presented.
Principal Issues: Is the value of an “excess deposit” in a taxpayer’s AgriInvest Account considered a “net income stabilization account” under subsection 110.6(1.1) and therefore deemed nil for purposes of the capital gains deduction?