Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 11/29/2015 - 02:13
s. 69(11) is ousted by s. 70(9.01)
Does s. 69(11) apply where s. 70(9.01) applies? CRA responded (TaxInterpretations translation):
Whether or not the taxpayer's legal representative...
The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.
Principales Questions: Whether subsection 69(11) applies where a transfer on a rollover basis of a farm property at death occurs pursuant to subsections 70(9) and 70(9.01)?
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 11/29/2015 - 02:15
"proceeds" of a gift for s. 55(3)(a)(i)(B) purposes were its deemed s. 69 proceeds of disposition
In the course of a series of transactions including the redemption of shares subject to s. 84(3), a corporation made a gift of cultural property...
The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.
Principales Questions: Whether the clause 55(3)(a)(i)(B) would apply in a particular situation where a corporation is disposing of a property, that meets all the conditions in subsection 110.1(1)(c), by way of gift to an unrelated person.
Position Adoptée: In this situation, yes.
Raisons: Under subparagraph 69(1)(b)(ii), except as expressly otherwise provided in the Act, where a taxpayer has disposed of anything to any person by way of gift inter vivos, the taxpayer shall be deemed to have received proceeds of disposition therefor equal to that fair market value. Thus, the disposition of the property would not be subject to the application of paragraph 55(3)(a)(i), as such disposition by the corporation will be deemed by subparagraph 69(1)(b)(ii) to be at fair market value. Then, the clause 55(3)(a)(i)(B) would apply.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 11/29/2015 - 02:12
loan v. contribution
A loan by the employer to the RCA, equal to the refundable tax balance, is used by the RCA will pay a lump-sum amount to an employee to terminate...
The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.
Principal Issues: The taxpayer requests our opinion regarding whether an amount paid by an employer to an RCA constitutes a contribution to the RCA.
Position: Question of fact.
Reasons: It is a question of fact whether an amount paid by an employer to an RCA is a contribution or a bona fide loan. In order to make such a determination, it is necessary to review all of the relevant facts and documents surrounding a particular situation.
Principal Issues: What are the tax consequences where a Canadian resident withdraws amounts from a retirement account in the Isle of Man? Can amounts in the retirement account be transferred to an RRSP?
Position: Canadian resident taxed on worldwide income. All amounts withdrawn from the retirement income must be included in the Canadian resident taxpayer's income in the year received. A transfer from the retirement account to an RRSP is not possible.
Principales Questions: Les exigences requises pour émettre le certificat T2202A ainsi que de savoir si la clientèle décrite dans la situation ci-dessous est éligible aux crédits d'impôt pour études? What are the requirements to issue Certificate T2202A as well as whether the fees incurred qualify as an education tax credit?
Position Adoptée: Voir lettre ci-dessous. See letter below.
Raisons: Voir lettre ci-dessous. See letter below.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 11/29/2015 - 02:12
Park needs to demonstrate it is performing municipal-type services
A Park was established to encourage an appreciation and use of natural and recreational resources, was authorized under its constituting...
The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.
Principal Issues: Does the Park qualify as a municipal or public body performing a function of government for purposes of 149(1)(c) of the Act and the definition of a qualified donee in subsection 149.1(1).
Position: We require additional information in order to make a determination.
Reasons: They need to demonstrate that they are actually performing the functions of government they are empowered to perform.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 11/29/2015 - 02:17
witness protection payments not income if for protection
A lump sum paid to a witness by the Sureté du Québec (Quebec police) was potentially income to him. CRA stated (TaxInterpretations...
The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.
Principales Questions: Quel est le traitement fiscal d'un montant forfaitaire accordé à un témoin dans le cadre d'une entente entre le témoin et la Sureté du Québec (« SQ »)? / What is the tax treatment of a lump sum payment to a witness based on an agreement between the witness and the SQ?
Position Adoptée: Le montant forfaitaire pourrait être imposable / The lump sum payment could be taxable.
Raisons: Le montant forfaitaire serait présumé avoir été reçu suite à la prestation de services en vertu de cette entente. / The lump sum payment could be deemed to have been received according to the service agreement.