Income Tax Severed Letters - 2013-09-25

Ruling

2013 Ruling 2012-0472291R3 - Loss consolidation

CRA Tags
55(3)(a), 88(1.1), 20(1)(c)
losses generated in newco to be wound up into public profitco; interest paid (in cash) only on maturity; cashless unwinding

Principal Issues: Loss consolidation

Position: Favourable rulings issued.

Reasons: Meets statutory and administrative requirements.

Technical Interpretation - External

5 September 2013 External T.I. 2011-0431031E5 - Guatemala's taxes

CRA Tags
ITR 5907(1), Guatemala Decree 4-2012, ITR 5907(2), Guatemala Decree Number 26-92 Ley del Impuesto Sobre la Renta, Guatemala Decree Number 37-92 Ley del Impuesto de Timbres Fiscales y de Papel Sellado Especial Para Protocolos, 95, Guatemala Decree 10-2012

Principal Issues: 1) Is the Guatemalan tax on gross revenue an "income or profits tax"?
2) Would the earnings of an FA paying Guatemalan tax on gross revenues and that carries on its active business only in Guatemala be computed under subparagraph (a)(i) or (a)(iii) of the definition of "earnings" in subsection 5907(1) of the Regulations?
3) Would the tax that non-resident shareholders without a PE pay on Guatemalan source dividends after January 1, 2013, be considered an "income or profits tax"?

Position: 1) Yes.
2) Subparagraph (a)(iii).
3) Yes.

Reasons: 1) After a review of the applicable legislation, it was determined that the Guatemalan tax on gross revenue is part of a comprehensive income tax regime and is tightly linked and subordinate to what would otherwise be accepted as an income or profits tax. More specifically, the tax on gross revenue is levied under the same statute as an otherwise tax on net income which itself is not of such an unreasonably high rate as to remove the elective nature of a taxpayer's choice between the two options. Moreover, given that a taxpayer has an opportunity to elect annually to choose whether to be taxed on gross revenue or net income, the tax paid will generally be limited to a maximum amount computed by reference to net income.
2) There is no requirement to compute income or profit (i.e. net income) in a taxation year in which the taxpayer has elected to pay tax by reference to gross revenue.
3) Decree No. 10-2012 institutes a tax on non-resident shareholders receiving Guatemalan dividends in a manner similar to Part XIII withholding taxes on dividends.

24 July 2013 External T.I. 2013-0497761E5 - Income splitting for RCA income

CRA Tags
8300(1), 8500(1) of the Regulations, 118(7), 60.03(1)

Principal Issues: Whether distributions out of or under a retirement compensation arrangement (RCA) are eligible for pension income splitting under the Act.

Position: Yes, effective for the 2013 and subsequent taxation years and provided that the amounts received out of or under a RCA meet the conditions in subsection 60.03(1) and the definition of eligible pension income.

Reasons: The legislative amendments to subsection 60.03(1) allow a taxpayer, age 65 or older, to split certain amounts received out of or under a RCA with a spouse or common-law partner.

28 March 2013 External T.I. 2012-0472221E5 - Principal Residence Designation

CRA Tags
54

Principal Issues: Can a non-resident taxpayer designate a condominium unit in Canada that the taxpayer owns as the taxpayer's principal residence?

Position: Question of fact but in this case probably not.

Reasons: The use of the principal residence exemption by a taxpayer is limited by reference to the number of taxation years ending after the acquisition date during which the taxpayer was resident in Canada.

Conference

5 October 2012 Roundtable, 2012-0453231C6 F - Creditor's Group Life Insurance and CDA

CRA Tags
89(1), 148
Innovative case extended to individual policy: credit to borrowing CCPC’s CDA

Principales Questions: 1. In the context of creditor's group life insurance policies, whether the death benefit added to the corporate debtor's capital dividend account is reduced by any adjusted cost basis? 2. Whether we are prepared to apply the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Innovative to situations involving an individual life insurance policy taken by a corporate debtor, the creditor financial institution being the irrevocable beneficiary under the policy?

Position Adoptée: 1. In circumstances involving this particular type of "pure" insurance product, the CRA is prepared to accept that the full amount of the death benefit be added to the corporate debtor's capital dividend account, without a reduction by the adjusted cost basis. 2. Possibly, depending on the legal relationships between the parties.

Raisons: 1. Characteristics of the type of product described. 2. We will apply the decision if the corporate debtor is able to demonstrate that the proceeds of the life insurance policy were paid directly to the financial institution and the institution reduced the debt of the corporation under contract between the corporation and the institution.

3 June 2011 STEP Roundtable Q. 14, 2011-0401921C6 - 2011 STEP Conference - Q14 - Voluntary Disclosure

CRA Tags
220(3.1)

Principal Issues: Does voluntary disclosure only cover 10 years or could a taxpayer be subject to penalties that are more than 10 years old?

Position: Each case is unique and full disclosure of the non-compliance is required. The CRA can then look at each voluntary disclosure on a case by case basis. There are no legislative restrictions to assessing any year if the requirements of the applicable legislation are not met. The CRA will apply the legislation as it relates to the statute barred years and will assess income in the year it was earned.

Reasons: Legislation

9 November 2012 CTF Atlantic Roundtable, 2012-0465921C6 - CTF Atlantic - Statute Barred Years

CRA Tags
152(4.01), 152(4), 163(2)

Principal Issues: 1. What considerations go into the determination of whether or not there has been a misrepresentation?
2. Are only those issues arising from a misrepresentation in an otherwise statute-barred year subject to reassessment or may other issues be reassessed?
3. Would a tax avoidance arrangement generally be considered a misrepresentation?

Position: 1. In accordance with subparagraph 152(4)(a)(i), a misrepresentation must be "attributable to neglect, carelessness or wilful default" or it must involve the commission of fraud in order for the CRA to reassess the particular tax return beyond the normal reassessment period.
2. Only an item that "can reasonably be regarded as relating to . . . any misrepresentation made by the taxpayer or a person who filed the taxpayer's return of income for the year that is attributable to neglect carelessness" et cetera may be reassessed after the expiry of the normal reassessment period.
3. Tax avoidance arrangements would generally require a careful review of the facts of each case in order to determine whether a misrepresentation exists which would allow the issue to be reassessed beyond the normal reassessment period.

Reasons: 1. Based on wording of subparagraph 152(4)(a)(i). 2. Subsection 152(4.01) modifies the application of paragraphs 152(4)(a), (b), and (c). 3. The GAAR Committee requires that all submissions to the Committee identify the years to be assessed and will not authorize an assessment of an otherwise statute-barred year unless there are compelling reasons provided which meet the negligence threshold.

9 November 2012 CTF Atlantic Roundtable, 2012-0465981C6 - CTF Atlantic - Filing Electronically

CRA Tags
150, 50(1), ITR 1101(5b.1)

Principal Issues: When a tax return is filed electronically, how is an election included in the return?

Position: The CRA's goal is to expand the NETFILE and EFILE programs to remove most exclusions and barriers to electronic filing. This includes adding the ability for taxpayers to file forms and elections electronically. However, we are not yet at a point where this can be done. Until then, for returns that are filed electronically, all elections, including the supporting documentation, must be submitted to us in writing, unless otherwise indicated.

Reasons: See response.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

10 September 2013 Internal T.I. 2010-0387631I7 - Surplus accounts; Disposition of foreign affiliate

CRA Tags
9(3), 93.1, 40(3), ITR 5902, 113, ITR 5907, 95

Principal Issues: 1. How are the surplus accounts of a foreign affiliate computed when legal and economic rights to shares of the foreign affiliate are split? 2. A foreign affiliate pays a dividend to a shareholder, then the shareholder sells the shares of the foreign affiliate for a nominal amount. Can the dividend be recharacterized as a capital gain?

Position: 1. The holder of the legal rights is ignored. 2. Possibly

Reasons: 1. Previous positions. The bare trustee or nominee holds title to the shares on behalf of the beneficial owners. 2. A dividend may be deemed to be a capital gain under subsection 40(3) or GAAR may apply.

26 August 2013 Internal T.I. 2013-0494211I7 - participating debt interest

CRA Tags
212(3), Treaties Article XI(6)(b)
Cdn petroleum exploration company with no extracted petroleum pays participating interest re price of petroleum

Principal Issues: Is interest paid by a Canadian resident to a US resident subject to 15% Canadian withholding tax pursuant to subparagraph 6(b) of Article XI of the Canada-US Income Tax Treaty, where the interest is computed by reference to a public benchmark commodity index?

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The value of certain property owned by the borrower fluctuates in reference to the price of the commodity on the index.

12 July 2013 Internal T.I. 2013-0487181I7 - Extension of the reassessment period

CRA Tags
152(7), 152(4), 220(3)
period runs from assessment

Principal Issues: Can subsection 220(3) be used to extend a reassessment period which has become statute-barred?

Position: No

Reasons: Statute-barred date is determined by using the date of the Initial Notice of Assessment or Nil Assessment.