Search - considered
Results 2781 - 2790 of 2949 for considered
FCTD
Germain v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 DTC 5151 [at at 7370], 2012 FC 768
[40] The CRA Remission Guide states the following: Section III – Remission Guidelines Each remission request is considered on its own merits to determine whether collection of the tax or enforcement of the penalty is unreasonable or unjust, or if remission is in the public interest, in accordance with the broad terms set out in section 23 of the Financial Administration Act. ...
FCTD
The Queen v. Esskay Farms Ltd., 76 DTC 6010, [1976] CTC 24 (FCTD)
Since this bookkeeping arrangement was considered adequate for the Trust Co’s purpose, I do not think I am obliged to delve further into the vagaries and sufficiency of their bookkeeping methods, if the Trust Co is satisfied as to their adequacy, beyond ascertaining that the Trust Co was obligated and acknowledged itself obligated to the defendant for the purchase price of the land and for interest. ...
FCTD
R & W Such Holdings Ltd. v. The Queen, 96 DTC 6455, [1996] 3 CTC 221 (FCTD)
However, on an objective basis, the nature of the two operations must be considered. ...
FCTD
Stevenson & Hunt Insurance Brokers Ltd. v. The Queen, 93 DTC 5125, [1993] 1 CTC 383 (FCTD), briefly aff'd 98 DTC 6383 (FCA)
Analysis I have considered the evidence in this case and have concluded that in the absence of information acquired subsequent to the financial statement date, a reasonable estimate of contingent profit commissions could not be made by Stevenson & Hunt at the financial year end. ...
FCTD
The Queen v. Diemert, 76 DTC 6187, [1976] CTC 301 (FCTD)
The question was raised that because the employer was not so obliged whether the defendant could be considered to be “required” to pay these expenses “under the contract of employment” in the absence of a positive provision requiring him to do so. ...
FCTD
Allendale Mutual Insurance Co. v. The Queen, 73 DTC 5382, [1973] CTC 494 (FCTD)
In late 1967 Manufacturer’s, Firemen’s and Blackstone considered it advisable to combine the operations of the companies and obtained legal advice as to how to best achieve that desired end. ...
FCTD
Phyllis Moore v. The Queen, 87 DTC 5217, [1987] 1 CTC 319 (FCTD)
The evidence was that the parties considered the clauses applied only to “itinerant” teachers, such as French teachers, or music teachers, who might have to teach at two or more different schools on a given day. ...
FCTD
Re MNR and Chrysler Canada Ltd., 91 DTC 5526, [1991] 2 CTC 156 (FCTD)
I have considered carefully the statements by way of obiter dicta by J.O. ...
FCTD
Fidelity Investments Canada Ltd. v. Canada (Canada Revenue Agency), 2006 DTC 6360, 2006 FC 551
Discussion and Disposition [24] This proceeding arises under section 231.6 of the Act which provides as follows: 231.6. (1) For the purposes of this section, "foreign-based information or document" means any information or document that is available or located outside Canada and that may be relevant to the administration or enforcement of this Act, including the collection of any amount payable under this Act by any person. (2) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the Minister may, by notice served personally or by registered or certified mail, require that a person resident in Canada or a non-resident person carrying on business in Canada provide any foreign-based information or document. (3) The notice referred to in subsection 231.6(2) shall set out (a) a reasonable period of time of not less than 90 days for the production of the information or document; (b) a description of the information or document being sought; and (c) the consequences under subsection 231.6(8) to the person of the failure to provide the information or documents being sought within the period of time set out in the notice. (4) The person on whom a notice of a requirement is served under subsection 231.6(2) may, within 90 days after the service of the notice, apply to a judge for a review of the requirement. (5) On hearing an application under subsection 231.6(4) in respect of a requirement, a judge may (a) confirm the requirement; (b) vary the requirement as the judge considers appropriate in the circumstances; or (c) set aside the requirement if the judge is satisfied that the requirement is unreasonable. (6) For the purposes of paragraph 231.6(5)(c), the requirement to provide the information or document shall not be considered to be unreasonable because the information or document is under the control of or available to a non-resident person that is not controlled by the person served with the notice of the requirement under subsection 231.6(2) if that person is related to the non-resident person. (7) The period of time between the day on which an application for review of a requirement is made pursuant to subsection 231.6(4) and the day on which the review is decided shall not be counted in the computation of (a) the period of time set out in the notice of the requirement; and (b) the period of time within which an assessment may be made pursuant to subsection 152(4). (8) If a person fails to comply substantially with a notice served under subsection 231.6(2) and if the notice is not set aside by a judge pursuant to subsection 231.6(5), any court having jurisdiction in a civil proceeding relating to the administration or enforcement of this Act shall, on motion of the Minister, prohibit the introduction by that person of any foreign-based information or document covered by that notice. 231.6. (1) Pour l'application du présent article, un renseignement ou document étranger s'entend d'un renseignement accessible, ou d'un document situé, à l'étranger, qui peut être pris en compte pour l'application ou l'exécution de la présente loi, y compris la perception d'un montant payable par une personne en vertu de la présente loi. (2) Malgré les autres dispositions de la présente loi, le ministre peut, par avis signifié à personne ou envoyé par courrier recommandé ou certifié, exiger d'une personne résidant au Canada ou d'une personne n'y résidant pas mais y exploitant une entreprise de fournir des renseignements ou documents étrangers. (3) L'avis doit: a) indiquer le délai raisonnable, d'au moins 90 jours, dans lequel les renseignements ou documents étrangers doivent être fournis; b) décrire les renseignements ou documents étrangers recherchés; c) préciser les conséquences prévues au paragraphe (8) du défaut de fournir les renseignements ou documents étrangers recherchés dans le délai ci-dessus. (4) La personne à qui l'avis est signifié ou envoyé peut, dans les 90 jours suivant la date de signification ou d'envoi, contester, par requête à un juge, la mise en demeure du ministre. (5) À l'audition de la requête, le juge peut: a) confirmer la mise en demeure; b) modifier la mise en demeure de la façon qu'il estime indiquée dans les circonstances; c) déclarer sans effet la mise en demeure s'il est convaincu que celle-ci est déraisonnable. (6) Pour l'application de l'alinéa (5)c), le fait que des renseignements ou documents étrangers soient accessibles ou situés chez une personne non-résidente qui n'est pas contrôlée par la personne à qui l'avis est signifié ou envoyé, ou soient sous la garde de cette personne non-résidente, ne rend pas déraisonnable la mise en demeure de fournir ces renseignements ou documents, si ces deux personnes sont liées. (7) Le délai qui court entre le jour où une requête est présentée conformément au paragraphe (4) et le jour où il est décidé de la requête ne compte pas dans le calcul: a) du délai indiqué dans l'avis correspondant à la mise en demeure qui a donné lieu à la requête; b) du délai dans lequel une cotisation peut être établie conformément au paragraphe 152(4). (8) Si une personne ne fournit pas la totalité, ou presque, des renseignements ou documents étrangers visés par la mise en demeure signifiée conformément au paragraphe (2) et si la mise en demeure n'est pas déclarée sans effet par un juge en application du paragraphe (5), tout tribunal saisi d'une affaire civile portant sur l'application ou l'exécution de la présente loi doit, sur requête du ministre, refuser le dépôt en preuve par cette personne de tout renseignement ou document étranger visé par la mise en demeure. [25] I will first address the applicable standard of review. ...
FCTD
Taxpro Professional Corporation v. Canada (National Revenue), 2011 DTC 5036 [at at 5635], 2011 FC 224
Chief Justice Rip considered whether privilege attached to four types of communications between a lawyer and others. ...