Search - consideration
Results 3151 - 3160 of 11355 for consideration
T_Rev_B decision
Frederick D Cousins v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2017, 72 DTC 1055
Confining my consideration to the first claim, the question seems to be whether there was indeed a benefit conferred on the appellant by virtue of his contract of employment with IMC. ...
T Rev B decision
Belton Lumber Company Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2065, 72 DTC 1076
From a consideration of all the facts which have been disclosed in the evidence adduced at the hearing, I have reached the conclusion that the liability assumed in connection with Vaillancourt Inc’s line of credit, and which the appellant was called upon to pay, was nothing other than an outlay of capital made by it on behalf of P P Vaillancourt Inc, no doubt with the hope of preserving what had in the past proved to be, for the appellant, a valuable source of lumber at an advantageous price. ...
T Rev B decision
David P Hofer, Jacob R Hofer, John a Hofer, MRS Katie Hofer, Paul K Hofer, Paul S Hofer, John D Stahl, Peter Stahl, John S Wurz and Josh M. Wurz v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2291, 72 DTC 1245
From the material before the Board, it is clear that, in respect of the assessments for the 1963 to 1966 taxation years, an interval of 99 days had elapsed between the date of mailing of the Minister’s notifications under section 58 and the date of mailing of the purported notices of appeal to the Tax Appeal Board, and that the purported notices of appeal presented to the Board for consideration had been mailed to, and received by, the Registrar of the Tax Appeal Board well beyond the 90-day period reserved by statute for instituting an appeal. ...
T_Rev_B decision
George E Hofer, Elias R Stahl, Paul M Stahl, Andrew a Wurz, Elias R Wurz, Elias S Wurz and Rev Mike S Stahl v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2293, 72 DTC 1242
From the material before the Board, it is clear that, in respect of the assessments for the 1964 to 1966 taxation years, an interval of 99 days had elapsed between the date of mailing of the Minister’s notifications under section 58 and the date of mailing of the purported Notices of Appeal to the Tax Appeal Board, and that the purported Notices of Appeal presented to the Board for consideration had been mailed to, and received by, the Registrar of the Tax Appeal Board well beyond the 90-day period reserved by statute for instituting an appeal. ...
T_Rev_B decision
Andrew Wurz and Jacob Wurz v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2294, 72 DTC 1247
From the material before the Board, it is clear that, in respect of each of the assessments for the 1966 taxation year, an interval of 99 days had elapsed between the date of mailing of the Minister’s notifications under section 58 and the date of mailing of the purported Notices of Appeal to the Tax Appeal Board, and that the purported Notices of Appeal presented to the Board for consideration had been mailed to, and received by, the Registrar of the Tax Appeal Board well beyond the 90-day period reserved by statute for instituting an appeal. ...
T_Rev_B decision
George Wurz and Jacob R Wurz v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2296
From the material before the Board, it is clear that, in respect of the assessments for the 1961 and 1962 taxation years, an interval of 112 days had elapsed between the date of mailing of the Minister’s notifications under section 58 and the date of mailing of the purported notices of appeal to the Tax Appeal Board, and that the purported notices of appeal presented to the Board for consideration had been mailed to, and received by, the Registrar of the Tax Appeal Board well beyond the 90-day period reserved by statute for instituting an appeal. ...
T Rev B decision
Marilyn a Palmer v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2367, 72 DTC 1309
The appellant purchased the aforesaid lots by deed dated December 2, 1963 for a total consideration of $4,500 from the executors of the estate of the late John M Irwin. ...
T Rev B decision
J G Young & Son Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2370, 72 DTC 1319
In 1967 he accepted an offer for approximately 4 acres of land realizing a gain of $72,830.93, After careful consideration, it is not necessary in my opinion to review all the assumptions and all the factual details established in evidence. ...
T Rev B decision
Joseph Valevicius and Karl H Falk v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2490, 72 DTC 1407
Acreage considerations were disregarded in this division, as the appellant wanted the more picturesque Pottruff farm which had a creek and ravine running through it, and on which was located an old stone house in an attractive wooded setting. ...
T Rev B decision
Dorothy E Bacon, Clinton W Roenisch, Jr and Harold W Roenisch v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2530, 72 DTC 1440, [1972] DTC 1433
During the years under consideration the appellant company paid on behalf of the said purchasers, the principal and interest which fell due on the aforesaid mortgage and the bank interest on the bank loan as it accrued. ...