Search - 阿里拍卖 司法拍卖

Results 1691 - 1700 of 2793 for 阿里拍卖 司法拍卖
TCC (summary)

Suncor Energy Inc. v. The King, 2024 TCC 31 -- summary under Paragraph 13(27)(b)

However, that is all it does …. There is nothing in the wording of subsection 13(31) that creates the fiction of the Limited Partnership having a year-end prior to February 1, 2005 …. ...
TCC (summary)

Gorgis v. The King, 2024 TCC 109 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Subparagraph 254(2)(g)(ii)

In concluding that Gorgis had satisfied s. 254(2)(g)(i) through being the first occupant of the home “as a place of residence,” Cook J found that: Gorgis’ staying there two to four nights a week was consistent with it being a place of residence; Although he only moved in with “six pieces of luggage and a limited assortment of furniture there [was] no indication that he had significant personal belongings elsewhere” (para. 26); and “His use of the Property was more than transitory he was the sole occupant of the Property for one year and he still owns it and has use of the basement” (para. 27). ...
FCA (summary)

Bell Canada v. Canada (the King), 2025 FCA 27 -- summary under Supply

In affirming this finding, Boivin JA distinguished Kevin Davis Dentistry, which gave effect to the expressed Parliamentary intent to “provide for different tax treatment of supplies of orthodontic appliances and orthodontic service” (para. 25) whereas, here, the Ontario regulations did “not amount to as clear an indicator of Parliament’s intent as the GST Act did in Kevin Davis Dentistry and “the intended tax treatment of what would constitute separate supplies in the present circumstances is not outlined in any statute as it was in the GST Act in Kevin Davis Dentistry (para. 28). ...
SCC (summary)

The Queen (Man.) v. Air Canada, [1980] 2 SCR 303 -- summary under Subsection 92(2)

. Does the act of landing within a state, even regularly and on schedule, confer jurisdiction to tax? [W]hen a plane lands to receive and discharge passengers, to undergo servicing or repairs, or to await a convenient departing schedule, it does not in my opinion lose its character as a plane in transit. ...
TCC (summary)

White v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 414 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Subsection 148(1)

. [T]he phrase “return of premium” may be an accurate description of the maximum amount received by the Appellant upon the expiry of the term but it is misleading for the following reason. ... What the insurer paid as a benefit upon the expiry of the term was not, in a business sense or in an income tax sense, any part of the premiums for life insurance. It was part of the insurer’s earnings. ...
FCA (summary)

Canada v. Superior Plus Corp., 2015 DTC 5118 [at at 6319], 2015 FCA 241, aff'g 2015 TCC 132 -- summary under Subsection 245(4)

., 2011 FCA 120 information pertaining to the policy of the Act, even where it is not taxpayer specific, can be relevant on discovery. ...
TCC (summary)

Cartier House Care Centre Ltd. v. The Queen, 2015 TCC 278 -- summary under Home Care Service

. The use of specific examples after a general term in legislation does not restrict the meaning of the general term to cases similar to the specific examples. ... Katsikonouris, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1029 …. See summaries under Sched. V, Pt. ...
SCC (summary)

Placer Dome Canada Ltd. v. Ontario (Minister of Finance), 2006 DTC 6532, 2006 SCC 20, [2006] 1 SCR 715 -- summary under Futures/Forwards/Hedges

Profit- Futures/Forwards/Hedges “hedging includes cash settled derivatives including options The taxpayer sold its gold production to bullion dealers at the spot price but also, in order to manage the risk associated with fluctuations in the spot price of gold, entered into cash-settled derivatives such as forward contracts, spot deferred contracts, fixed interest floating lease rate contracts, put options and call options. ... PDC’s argument about the serious distortion implicit in treating options as a subset of forward sales is belied by the PDC’s own Annual Reports …. ...
Decision summary

Vocalspruce Ltd. v. Revenue and Customs Commissioners, [2014] BTC 50, [2014] EWCA Civ 1302 (English CA) -- summary under Interpretation/Definition Provisions

. I cannot accept this argument. The term defined is a related transaction; and the defined term may itself colour the meaning of the definition. ... It makes no sense to disregard part of the transaction, when the statute clearly requires the whole transaction to be disregarded, except for very limited purposes. In addition it is a well-known method of interpreting deeming provisions that one must treat as real the inevitable consequences flowing from the deemed state of affairs: DCC Holdings Ltd v HMRC [2010] UKSC 58, [2011] 1 WLR 44 at [38]. ...
TCC (summary)

Crooks v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 52 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Paragraph 254(2)(a)

Richards was not a “particular individual”, stating (at paras. 16, 17 & 19): [S. 254(2)(a)] requires the builder to make a supply by sale to Ms. Richards in order for her to be a particular individual. Ms. Richards not only believed that she had acquired no interest in the subject unit, but…at law, she had no beneficial interest… [T]he only supply made by the builder was the supply made pursuant to the original agreement. ...

Pages