Search - 辐射监测仪 校准

Filter by Type:

Results 791 - 800 of 23533 for 辐射监测仪 校准
FCA

Jurak v. Canada, 2003 FCA 58

NADON J.A.     BETWEEN:   ANTHONY JURAK   Appellant   and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   Respondent         Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, February 3, 2003.   ... NADON J.A.     BETWEEN:   ANTHONY JURAK   Appellant   and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   Respondent       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Pronounced from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, February 3, 2003)     LÉTOURNEAU J.A ... Tr., LL.L.               FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION     Date: 20030203                                                            Docket: A‑22‑02       BETWEEN:   ANTHONY JURAK   Appellant   and     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   Respondent                           REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION   NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD       FILE NO:                                A‑22‑02   CORAM:                                DESJARDINS J.A. ...
FCA

Jevremovic v. Canada, 2008 DTC 6263, 2007 FCA 125

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.                         NOËL J.A.     A-170-06 BETWEEN: LAZAR JEVREMOVIC Appellant and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent       A-171-06 BETWEEN:   NORMA MAEGE   Appellant   and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   Respondent     Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on March 28, 2007. Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 28, 2007.         ... LÉTOURNEAU J.A.                         NOËL J.A.   A-170-06 BETWEEN: LAZAR JEVREMOVIC Appellant and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent       A-171-06 BETWEEN:   NORMA MAEGE   Appellant   and     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   Respondent   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 28, 2007) NOËL J.A ...
FCA

CW Agencies Inc. v. Canada, 2001 FCA 393

BETWEEN:                                                                C.W. AGENCIES INC.                                                                                                                                                          ... AGENCIES INC.                                                                                                                                                          ...
FCTD

Seaspan International Ltd. v. Canada, 2002 FCT 675

Justice Blais BETWEEN:                                                   SEASPAN INTERNATIONAL LTD.                                                                                                                                                          Plaintiff                                                                                  and                                                         HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN                                                                                                                                                    Defendant                                      REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT              By these actions the plaintiff Seaspan International Ltd. seeks to obtain a refund from the defendant Her Majesty The Queen for federal sales tax and excise tax paid on diesel fuel it had purchased. [2]                               The plaintiff is a company incorporated under the laws of British Columbia, having an office in North Vancouver, B.C., carrying out the business of operating a tug and barge service on the British Columbia coast and internationally. ... Justice Blais: DATED:                         June APPEARANCES:                                  Mr. ...
FCA

Golden v. Canada, 2009 FCA 86

GOLDEN Appellant   and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent         BETWEEN:                                                                                                          Docket: A-184-08 SHARAN GOLDEN Appellant   and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Winnipeg, Manitoba, on March 16, 2009)       EVANS J.A ... APPEARANCES:   Barbara M. Shields FOR THE APPELLANT     Cecil S. Woon FOR THE RESPONDENT     SOLICITORS OF RECORD:   Aikins, MacAuley & Thorvaldson LLP Winnipeg, Manitoba FOR THE APPELLANT     John H. ...
FCA

Gamache v. Canada, 2002 FCA 254

BETWEEN:                                                                 ANDRÉ GAMACHE                                                                                                                                                        Applicant                                                                                  and                                                         HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN                                                                                                                                                    Respondent                                                                         JUDGMENT The application for judicial review is dismissed without costs.                                                                                                                                           Gilles Létourneau                                                                                                                                                                                    J.A. ... BETWEEN:                                                                 ANDRÉ GAMACHE                                                                                                                                                        Applicant                                                                                  and                                                         HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN                                                                                                                                                    Respondent                                            Hearing held at Québec, Quebec, on June 6, 2002.                                     ...
FCTD

3651541 Canada inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2007 FC 1255

  * * * * * * * * * *   [11]            The Minister’s Delegate relies upon Information Circular 92-2 and the case of Young v. ...       * * * * * * * * * *       [16]            The applicant submits that the Minister’s Delegate erred by taking account of irrelevant considerations and ignoring relevant ones. ...   * * * * * * * * * *   [26]            For all the above reasons, the application for judicial review is dismissed, with costs.     ...
TCC

Singh Sandhu v. The Queen, 2009 TCC 175

The following table provides a summary of the documents:   Director(s) of 9033-0010 Québec Inc. Based on Documents             Date Director Document Signed by Exhibit               1996                       1996-03-22 è Ajmer and Satnam governing documents Ajmer A‑2               1996-03-29 è Ajmer minutes Ajmer A‑3               1996-03-30 è Ajmer minutes Ajmer and Satnam A‑3               1996-04-18 è Satnam initial declaration Ajmer A‑4               1996-05-02 è Ajmer and Satnam bank forms Satnam I‑1 and I‑2, tab 6, page 5               1996-12-09 è Satnam 1996 annual declaration Ajmer A‑5               1997                       1997-10-15 è Satnam 1997 annual declaration Ajmer A‑6               1998                       1998-12-03 è Satnam 1998 annual declaration Ajmer A‑7               1999                       1999-03-31 (or later) è Ajmer financial statements* Ajmer I‑1 and I‑2, tab 14               *Signed by Ajmer "on behalf of the Board of Directors" on the page entitled "Balance Sheet."             2000                       2000-05-15 (or later) è Ajmer financial statements* Ajmer I‑1 and I‑2, tab 15               *Signed by Ajmer "on behalf of the Board of Directors" on the page entitled "Balance Sheet."             2000-09-25 è Satnam * minutes Ajmer and Satnam A‑1 and A‑3               * Ajmer resigned at the same time.             2000-11-01  (1) è Ajmer 1999 annual declaration Ajmer A‑9               2000-11-01  (2) è Ajmer 2000 annual declaration Ajmer A‑10               2000-11-01   (3) è Ajmer amended declaration u Ajmer A‑11               u According to the amended declaration, the initial declaration and the 1996, 1997 and 1998 annual declarations were incorrect. ...
FCA

Policoff v. Lamborghini (Canada), docket A-479-95

DÉCARY J.A.              LÉTOURNEAU J.A. BETWEEN:      IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,     - and-      IN THE MATTER OF AN ASSESSMENT OR ASSESSMENTS      BY THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE UNDER      ONE OR MORE OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,      CANADA PENSION PLAN, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT      against:      LAMBORGHINI (CANADA),      Appellant      (Opposant in first instance),      AND:      THE QUEEN     -and-      SARAH POLICOFF,      Respondents.      ... FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL           A-479-95 BETWEEN:      IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,     - and-      IN THE MATTER OF AN ASSESSMENT OR ASSESSMENTS      BY THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE UNDER      ONE OR MORE OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,      CANADA PENSION PLAN, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT      against:      LAMBORGHINI (CANADA),      Appellant      (Opposant in first instance),      AND:      THE QUEEN     -and-      SARAH POLICOFF,      Respondents.           ... DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:      The Honourable Mr. Justice Denault      Dated:      October 30, 1997     - 2- APPEARANCES:      Yves Paquette      for the appellant      Hélène Beaumont      for the respondent The Queen      Jean Lozeau      for Groupe Pigeon & Ass. ...
FCTD

Raglan Holdings Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2008 FC 605

Canada (National Revenue), 2008 FC 605     Date: 20080521                                                                                                                                  Dockets: T-1960-06 T-1961-06 T-1962-06   Citation: 2008 FC 605 BETWEEN: HUGH STANFIELD DIRECTOR OF RAGLAN HOLDINGS INC., RAGLAN HOLDING INC., and HUGH STANFIELD   Applicant and   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE   Respondent       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT     Pinard J ...       * * * * * * *       [10]            The only issue that arises in this application is whether the Minister erred in issuing the Requirements for Information ...   * * * * * * *       [18]            For all the above reasons, the application for judicial review must be dismissed, with costs, in each case, namely T-1960-06, T-1961-06 and T-1962-06.     ...

Pages