Income Tax Severed Letters - 2017-04-26

Technical Interpretation - External

14 March 2017 External T.I. 2016-0656101E5 F - Death Benefit

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1) prestation consécutive au décès, 56(1)a)(iii)
sole shareholder who did not receive salary every year could receive a death benefit/staggered payment

Principales Questions: 1) Does the fact that a corporation has paid salary to the deceased sole shareholders for many tax years, but only dividends for the past two tax years affect the characterization of a payment as a death benefit? 2) Would the response in 1) be different if the deceased only received dividends and never received any remuneration/salary from the corporation? 3) Whether the minutes of a meeting of the directors of the corporation providing for the payment of a death benefit to the sole shareholder need to be done prior to his/her death? 4) Whether there is a time limit within which a payment to a taxpayer must be made?

Position Adoptée: 1) It is a question of fact but the fact that the corporation only paid dividends for the past two tax years prior to the individual's death does not, in and of itself, preclude the amount from qualifying as a death benefit. 2) Question of fact, but it does not seem reasonable to conclude that an amount paid would be in recognition of the deceased service in an office or employment. 3) We accept that a payment to the taxpayer may be a death benefit where all requirements in the definition of death benefit are satisfied. There is no obligation to have the minutes providing the payment of a death benefit before or after the death of the employee.
4) There is no time limit to pay a death benefit.

Raisons: 1) and 2) Definitions of death benefit, office and employee at paragraph 248(1). 3) Definition of death benefit. 4) Definition of death benefit at paragraph 248(1). Paragraph 14 of Interpretation Bulletin IT-508R.

28 February 2017 External T.I. 2016-0673231E5 - Principal residence exemption and secondary suites

Unedited CRA Tags
45(1)(c)

Principal Issues: Clarification on the factors used to determine if the CRA’s administrative policy for not having the change-in-use rules under paragraph 45(1)(c) apply.

Position: A partial change in use of the taxpayer’s principal residence technically occurs for income tax purposes under paragraph 45(1)(c) unless the administrative position in Income Tax Folio S1-F3-C2, Principal Residence, applies.

Reasons: The law and the CRA’s administrative position in Income Tax Folio S1-F3-C2, "Principal Residence".

14 February 2017 External T.I. 2016-0668851E5 - Indian Pension Income Transferred on Divorce

Unedited CRA Tags
81(1)(a) and 56(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act and 87(1)(b) of the Indian Act

Principal Issues: Whether benefits of a pension plan transferred on divorce remain exempt from income tax under section 87 of the Indian Act.

Position: Depends on the facts.

Reasons: See below.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

16 January 2017 Internal T.I. 2016-0651411I7 - Reassessment period – transfer pricing

Unedited CRA Tags
ITA: 152(4)(b)(iii); 152(4.01)(b)(iii); 247(2); 124(4); ITR: 402(3)
s. 152(4)(b)(iii) permits a reallocation of taxable income among provinces where a taxpayer’s sales revenue has been increased under s. 247(2)

Principal Issues: Whether subparagraph 152(4)(b)(iii) of the Act allows the Minister to issue an assessment, reassessment or additional assessment of tax under Part I beyond the normal reassessment period (i) to reattribute taxable income earned in a province with respect to a sale of goods to a non-arm’s length non-resident person, (ii) to increase gross revenue attributable to a province that results from a transfer pricing adjustment.

Position: Yes, to the extent that the assessment or reassessment reasonably relates to a transaction involving the taxpayer and a non-arm’s length non-resident person.

Reasons: An amount assessed or reassessed under Part I includes an assessment or reassessment of the deduction under section 124 of the Act. Such assessment or reassessment would include an assessment to reattribute taxable income earned in the year in a province as defined in subsection 124(4) of the Act and any Regulations prescribed for this purpose.

1 November 2016 Internal T.I. 2016-0663971I7 - 104(6)(b), whether amount became payable

Unedited CRA Tags
104(6)(b), 104(13), 104(24), 105(1)
income that is paid to a minor beneficiary in contravention of the trust deed is non-deductible under s. 104(6)
income distributions to minor beneficiaries contrary to trust deed included under s. 105(1)
distribution contrary to trust deed not considered to be payable
prohibited distribution from trust

Principal Issues: 1. Whether an amount became payable in the year to a beneficiary for the purposes of paragraph 104(6)(b) 2. Whether an amount paid under the trust to a beneficiary is included in income under subsection 105(1)

Position: 1. No 2. Yes

Reasons: 1. Wording of paragraph 104(6)(b); meaning of became payable in the year 2. Wording of subsection 105(1)