Income Tax Severed Letters - 2016-07-27

Ruling

2016 Ruling 2015-0615041R3 - Conversion of Delaware corporation to LLC

CRA Tags
248(1)
conversion of a Delaware corp. to an LLC not a disposition

Principal Issues: 1. Whether, after the conversion, the LLC will be considered to be the same corporation as the Delaware corporation. 2. Whether there is a disposition of the assets of a Delaware corporation upon its conversion to an LLC. 3. Whether there is a disposition of the shares of the Delaware corporation upon its conversion to an LLC. 4. Whether, after the conversion, the ACB of the shares of the LLC to the shareholder will be equal to the ACB of the shares of the Delaware corporation to the shareholder immediately before the conversion.

Position: 1. Yes. 2. No. 3. No. 4. Yes.

Reasons: The governing Delaware legislation provides for conversion and treats the LLC as a continuation of the converting corporation. CRA can apply the Delaware legislation for purposes of administering the Act. CRA’s administrative position is that a Delaware LLC is a corporation for purposes of the Act.

2015 Ruling 2014-0558831R3 - No-type of property spin-off butterfly

CRA Tags
55(3)(b), 80, 86, 112, 245(2)
prior drop-down of assets to Newco/split of DC manager's business/CEC proration/replacement option issuance as boot
replacement stock options issued by Spinco treated as boot
new common shares with same attributes as old subject to rights of new special shares/pro rata PUC
proration of CEC preliminary to butterfly
splitting of fee for management of 2 divisions not a disposition of contract

Principal Issues: Creation of a new public corporation to own the transferred property.

Position: Favourable rulings given

Reasons: In compliance with the Act and previous positions

Technical Interpretation - External

27 June 2016 External T.I. 2014-0532601E5 - Paragraph 94(3)(f) electing trust and form T1135

CRA Tags
94(3)(a), 233.3
no T1135 filing required by non-resident portion trust (or by particular trust if it has no foreign property)
non-resident portion trust not a specified Canadian entity

Principal Issues: Where a deemed resident trust has elected to have paragraph 94(3)(f) apply whether the non-resident portion trust or the particular trust are required to file form T1135.

Position: No

Reasons: The non-resident portion trust is not a deemed resident trust pursuant to 94(3)(a) and is not a "specified Canadian entity" pursuant to section 233.3 of the Act. The particular trust, although a deemed resident trust and a "specified Canadian entity" does not own any "specified foreign property" thus does not meet the requirements of section 233.3 of the Act to file form T1135.

17 May 2016 External T.I. 2014-0546831E5 - Electing mutual fund trust's income

acquisition of calendar trust after Dec 15 year end of acquiror
inclusion where bottom trust with Dec 15 year end was acquired in stub period and distributes post-Dec. 15 earnings on Dec. 31

Principal Issues: A mutual fund trust elects under subsection 132.11(1) to use a December 15 taxation year (electing MFT). Electing MFT acquires a beneficial interest in another trust (underlying trust) after the electing MFT's December 15, 201x taxation year, but before the end of the calendar year: 1. If the underlying trust makes an income distribution after December 15, but before the end of its December 31, 201x taxation year, will the income be included in the electing MFT's December 15, 201x taxation year, or will it be included in the electing MFT’s subsequent December 15 taxation year? 2. Would the response in (1) differ, if the underlying trust had also elected under subsection 132.11(1) to have a December 15 taxation year?

Position: 1. The electing MFT must include the income paid or payable by the underlying trust in its December 15, 201x taxation year. 2. The result is the same.

Reasons: 1. Electing MFT is a beneficiary of the underlying trust and the underlying trust's December 31 taxation year ends in the calendar year after the electing MFT's December 15 taxation year; therefore, subsection 132.11(3) applies. 2. Subsection 132.11(4) and paragraph 132.11(5)(c) will apply such that the top electing MFT will be deemed to be a beneficiary of the underlying trust on December 15, and each amount that is paid or becomes payable by a the underlying trust in the last 16 days of the calendar year will be deemed to be paid or to have become payable on December 15.

20 April 2016 External T.I. 2015-0601141E5 - Delay in final distribution from spousal trust

CRA Tags
70(6), 104(13.3), 104(13.4)
spousal trust can have a final distribution date 36 months after testator’s death

Principal Issues: Where a will is drafted to create a testamentary spousal trust and the will provides that the final distribution date of the trust is three years after the death of the surviving spouse, would the trust be precluded from being a spousal trust pursuant to subsection 70(6)?

Position: Question of fact and law; generally, such extension would not in and by itself prevent the trust from qualifying as a spousal trust.

Reasons: The conditions in subsection 70(6) would not typically be impacted by an extension of time provided for in the will.

16 March 2016 External T.I. 2016-0629491E5 - Indian Employment Income

CRA Tags
Indian Act 87, 81(1)(a)

Principal Issues: Whether employment income of an Indian employee is exempt from income tax?

Position: Question of fact, likely yes.

Reasons: See below.

29 February 2016 External T.I. 2015-0614151E5 - Deductibility of Actuarial Fees

CRA Tags
18(1)(a), 18(1)(b), 18(1)(h), 60(o.1)

Principal Issues: Whether actuarial fees incurred in connection with the division of pension benefits on marriage or common-law partnership breakdown are deductible in computing income?

Position: No.

Reasons: The actuarial fees were incurred on account of capital and paragraph 18(1)(b) would apply to deny the deduction.

29 February 2016 External T.I. 2015-0617341E5 - RCA election in subsection 207.5(2)

CRA Tags
207.5(2), 207.5(3)

Principal Issues: Whether the comments in 2004-0068231I7 relating to the application of the election remain valid.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: Law is unchanged.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

21 June 2016 Internal T.I. 2015-0581151I7 - Dutch Co-Op Entity Classification

CRA Tags
248(1) "corporation"
Dutch co-op a corp., not partnership
two-step approach applied to finding Dutch co-op a corporation

Principal Issues: Whether a particular Dutch cooperative would be treated as a corporation for the purposes of the Act?

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The provisions of the foreign legislation and the articles creating the Dutch cooperative support the conclusion that this entity should be treated as a corporation for the purposes of the Act.

13 April 2016 Internal T.I. 2015-0615201I7 - Lump sum GIS payments

CRA Tags
70(2), 110(1)(f)

Principal Issues: An estate receives a corrective lump sum GIS payment in respect of the deceased. 1) What are the tax consequences of that payment? 2) Is there a requirement to report the income where a clearance certificate was previously issued?

Position: 1) The lump sum payment is required to be included in the income of the estate the year it is received. Alternatively, where the criteria under subsection 70(2) are met, a rights or things return may be filed. Regardless of how the income is reported a paragraph 110(1)(f) deduction is available in calculating taxable income which usually renders such payments non-taxable. 2) Yes

Reasons: 1) Clause 56(1)(a)(i)(A) requires the lump sum payment to be included in the income of the estate. The GIS payment is a right or thing of the deceased, the nature of the payment does not change when it is paid to the estate as a corrective lump sum amount .Where the amount is included on a rights or things return it may reduce certain deductions or credits. 2) A clearance certificate covers only the properties controlled by the executor from the date the executor took control of the estate to the date the clearance certificate was requested. If additional property is discovered the executor must request another clearance certificate in respect of that property.