Income Tax Severed Letters - 2014-12-30

Technical Interpretation - External

6 November 2014 External T.I. 2014-0530991E5 - Liability for the failure to withhold

CRA Tags
153(3), 227.1(1), 153(1)
no employer liability for undeducted income tax/penalty liability of unincorporated managing members
no employer liability for undeducted income tax

Principal Issues: Whether a corporation or association, together with the directors of the corporation or members of the association, are liable for the amount that was required to be withheld with respect to the taxable benefits of its employees who are resident in Canada?

Position: No.

Reasons: Where the payor has failed to withhold or deduct an amount as required under the provisions of 153(1) of the Act in respect of Canadian-resident employees, the payor is only liable to penalties and interest under section 227. However, if the employees are non-resident of Canada, the payor is also liable to pay the amount that was required to be withheld. Under subsection 227.1(1), the directors of a corporation, together with the corporation, are jointly and severally, or solidarily, liable to pay the amount and any interest and penalties. If the employer is an unincorporated association, the association and its members may be similarly held liable.

21 August 2014 External T.I. 2014-0527611E5 - T1135 for Deceased Individual

CRA Tags
233.3, 70(5)
nil cost amount at year end for deceased individual

Principal Issues: For the T1135, how to calculate the cost amount of shares held as capital property in the year of death of an individual.

Position: Cost amount at year-end will be nil.

Reasons: A taxpayer who is deceased cannot hold property.

Conference

10 October 2014 APFF Roundtable, 2014-0538241C6 F - 75(2) and definition of "earned income" in 146(1)

CRA Tags
75(2), 108(5), 146(1)(a)(iii) "earned income", 40(3.6), 251.1(1)
character preservation of s. 75(2) attributed income
basis adjustment for denied capital loss (otherwise subject to s. 75(2) attribution) at trust level
character preservation of attributed income/basis adjustment for denied capital loss at trust level

Principales Questions: Question 5A) a) When an immovable rental property has been transferred to a trust, whether the nature of the attributed income under subsection 75(2) retains its nature? b) If the attributed income retains its nature, how the CRA expects the tax practitioners to prepare and file the T3 Trust Income Tax and Information Return and the T3 Statement of Trust Income Allocations and Designations ("T3 Statement") in order to ensure that the rental income is considered in calculating the taxpayer's "RRSP deduction limit" under subsection 146(1)? Question 5B) Mr. X owns the controlling shares of the capital stock of Opco. A protective trust, settled by Mr. X, owns the remaining shares of the capital stock of Opco. Mr. X is the sole beneficiary of the protective trust. The shares owned by the protective trust have the following attributes: paid-up capital of $10; adjusted cost base of $10,000 and redemption value of $10,000. On the redemption by Opco of some shares owned by the protective trust, a deemed dividend is attributed to Mr. X by virtue of subsection 75(2) and the capital loss would be deemed to be nil by virtue of subsection 40(3.6). a) Whether the loss will be deemed to be nil in this situation. b) In the affirmative, whether the loss determined without reference to subsection 40(3.6) will be attributed to Mr. X. c) As a result of the application of paragraph 40(3.6)(b), whether the loss will be added to the adjusted cost base of the shares owned by Mr. X or to the adjusted cost base of the shares owned by the protective trust. d) If Mr. X does not own any shares of the capital stock of Opco and if all the shares of the capital stock of Opco are owned by the protective trust, whether the trust will be affiliated to Opco under section 251.1, and whether the answers to questions a), b) and c) will be different.

Position Adoptée: Question 5A) a) When subsection 75(2) applies, the rental income from the immovable property is deemed to be income from property of that person. For purposes of calculating the "RRSP deduction limit" of the person referred to in subsection 75(2), that income from property may be included in his or her "earned income", as stated in the definition of that term in subparagraph146(1)(a)(iii). b) As the rental income from immovable property under subsection 75(2) retains its nature, this income should be reported in box 26 "other income" of the T3 Statement, followed by an asterisk referring to the footnotes area of the statement. In this area, the preparer should mention that the income included in box 26 constitutes net rental income from an immovable property subject to subsection 75(2) of the ITA. Question 5B) a) Yes, the loss will be deemed to be nil; b) The loss would not be attributed to anyone; c) The loss will be added to adjusted cost base of the shares owned by the protective trust; d) In this situation, the protective trust will still be affiliated to Opco and the answers to questions a), b) and c) would be the same.

Raisons: Based on our interpretation of relevant provisions of the Act and consistent with our positions in previous technical interpretations.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

8 October 2014 Internal T.I. 2014-0539571I7 - NL tax vs Non-Res Surtax

CRA Tags
Interpretation Act 35, ITR 2602, 120, Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act, 115(1)(a)(i), 12(4)
Nfld. Offshore employment income
Nfld. Offshore employment income

Principal Issues: Is employment income earned by a non-resident individual working in the Newfoundland offshore area (NOA) subject to (a) tax by the province of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) because it is income earned in a province; or (b) the surtax in subsection 120(1) because it is not income earned in a province?

Position: Employment income earned by a non-resident working in the NOA is subject to the surtax set out in subsection 120(1) and is not subject to NL provincial tax.

Reasons: The NOA is not part of NL such that the employment income is not reasonably attributable to duties performed by the taxpayer in the province. Also, unlike for the purposes of section 124 and the determination of taxable income earned in the year in a province by a corporation, the NOA is not itself a province for the purposes of determining an individual's tax liability under the Act.

12 September 2014 Internal T.I. 2014-0518641I7 - Consequential Adjustments to Corporate Min Tax

CRA Tags
152(4.3), 152(4.4)
CMT reassessment to reflect loss carryback to prior year

Principal Issues: Whether adjustments can be made to Ontario Corporate Minimum Tax in a statute-barred taxation year to take into account changes in balances to a prior taxation year (e.g., application of a loss carry back)?

Position: Yes.

Reasons: Subsection 112(2) of Ontario's Taxation Act, 2007 provides that subsection 152(4.3) of the Income Tax Act applies for the purposes of the Taxation Act, 2007. Subsection 152(4.3) allows the Minister to reassess beyond the normal reassessment period where it is necessary to do so in order to make a recalculation of a taxpayer's "balance" for that year as a result of an adjustment included in the computation of a "balance" for previous taxation year. Because of subsection 112(2) of the Taxation Act, 2007, the definition of "balance" in 152(4.4) of the Act would include the amounts that have been changed for the Corporate Minimum Tax in a taxation year as a result of a reassessment.