Income Tax Severed Letters - 2008-07-11

Ruling

2008 Ruling 2008-0265631R3 - Amendment to a DSU Plan

Unedited CRA Tags
6801(d)

Principal Issues: Will the existing rulings for an existing DSU plan continue if the plan is amended to:
1) change the method of calculating the payout value; and
2) change the period in which the payout must occur.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: 1) Paragraph 6801(d) of the Regulations requires a payout be based on the FMV of a share of a Corporation or a related corporation. The existing plan uses a formula that uses the closing price of a share determined on a particular date on a particular exchange. XXXXXXXXXX .
The existing plan uses the same formula to determine the number of DSUs to be awarded to a participant. This formula will not be amended for the purpose of awarding DSUs. This simpler formula is being used to simplify the determinations required for the more frequent allocation of units. XXXXXXXXXX .
2) The change in payout dates is not an issue as it fully complies with the requirements of paragraph 6801(d) of the Regulations.

2008 Ruling 2008-0266441R3 - Debt Forgiveness

Unedited CRA Tags
80 13(21.2) 111 40(2)(e.1)

Principal Issues: In a recapitalization of a Pubco contemplated by a plan of arrangement where the debts forgiveness occurs immediately before the acquisition of control, 1) Whether the settlement of notes will result in a forgiven amount equal to the lesser of the amount for which the notes were issued and their principal amount, minus the fair market value of the Newpubco shares delivered; 2) Whether the amount of the excess described in paragraph 13(21.2)(b) in respect of depreciable properties transferred to an affiliated person will be deemed to be a property owned until the time that is immediately before the time that is immediately before the acquisition of control time; 3) Whether paragraph 111(4)(d) will apply to deem each amount required by paragraph 111(4)(c) to be deducted in computing the adjusted cost base to Debtor of a property to be a capital loss of Debtor for the acquisition of control taxation year from the disposition of property.

Position: 1) to 3) Yes.

Reasons: 1) The Newpubco shares will be delivered in satisfaction of the principal amount of the notes; 2) and 3) The ordering of the series of transactions respects the law.

2008 Ruling 2007-0241221R3 - 55(3)(b) butterfly reorganization

Unedited CRA Tags
55(3)(b)

Principal Issues: Whether the proposed butterfly reorganization meets the requirements of paragraph 55(3)(b).

Position: Yes

Reasons: Meets the requirements of the law.

2008 Ruling 2006-0212871R3 - Income of a Foreign Affiliate

Unedited CRA Tags
95(2)(a.3); 95(2.4)

Principal Issues: Whether certain income to be earned by a foreign affiliate of Parent will be income from a business other than an active business pursuant to paragraph 95(2)(a.3) of the Act.

Position: No.

Reasons: The income will fall within the subsection 95(2.4) exception to paragraph 95(2)(a.3) of the Act.

2008 Ruling 2007-0262301R3 F - Montant forfaitaire - Prestation de retraite

Unedited CRA Tags
56(1)a)(i)

Principales Questions:
Les montants forfaitaires sont-ils imposables conformément au sous-alinéa 56(1)a)(i)?

Position Adoptée:
Oui, les montants sont imposables en vertu du sous-alinéa 56(1)a)(i).

Raisons:
Selon les faits, les montants forfaitaires constituent des paiements au titre d'une prestation de retraite ou de pension.

2007 Ruling 2006-0206461R3 - Employee Benefit Plan - Partnership interest

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1) 6(1)(a) 9(1) 6(1)(g)

Principal Issues: (A) Is a particular plan an employee benefit plan for purposes of 248(1) of the Income Tax Act? (B) Is a particular plan a salary deferral arrangement? (C) Have participants of the plan received an employment benefit by virtue of their interest holdings in the trust pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act? (D) Are reasonable admin expenses incurred by the plan deductible by the trust? (E) Will the provisions of 104(6)(a.1) apply to the trust with respect to amounts paid to employees? (F) Will employer contributions be deductible by the employer pursuant to subsection 32.1? (G) Will distributions from the plan be subject to 6(1)(g)?

Position: (A) Yes (B) No (C) No (D) Yes, subject to section 67 (E) Yes (F) Yes (G) Yes

Reasons: (A) wording of the definition of an EBP (B) wording of the definition of a SDA (C) paragraph 6(1)(a) benefits exclude benefits under an EBP (D) The legislation provides for deduction of reasonable administrative expenses within the trust provided the expenses were incurred to earn income under paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Act (E) wording of the legislation (F) plan is an EBP, therefore subsection 32.1(1), 32.1(2) and 32.1(3) of the Act will apply to the employer (G) wording of paragraph 6(1)(g)

2007 Ruling 2007-0251181R3 - Employee Benefit Plan - Partnership interest

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1) 6(1)(a) 9(1) 6(1)(g)

Principal Issues: Supplemental Ruling Request to 2006-020646 dated XXXXXXXXXX , 2007. Request made to revise the wording of paragraph 17 of the original ruling reply for clarity.

Position: No effect on original rulings as issued.

XXXXXXXXXX 2007-025118

XXXXXXXXXX , 2007

Ministerial Correspondence

30 January 2008 Ministerial Correspondence 2007-0262251M4 - foreign disability pension

Unedited CRA Tags
56 110

Principal Issues: Taxation of US military disability pension received by a resident of Canada.

Position: The pension must be included in income but is likely deductible in calculating taxable income.

Reasons: The Act and the Canada-US treaty provide for the inclusion of the amount in income but also allow a deduction provided it would be tax free if received by a resident of the U.S.

Technical Interpretation - External

3 July 2008 External T.I. 2007-0251471E5 - Motor Vehicles & Automobiles - Personal Travel

Unedited CRA Tags
6(1)(a) 248(1) 6(2)

Principal Issues: Will a taxable benefit arise for the use of an employer provided motor vehicle to travel between home and work?

Position: Yes

Reasons: Legislation

2 July 2008 External T.I. 2008-0280831E5 - DPSP - Vested Amounts

Unedited CRA Tags
60(j.1)

Principal Issues: Are amounts already paid to an employee from a DPSP, considered to be vested at the time a retiring allowance is paid to the employee?

Position: Yes

Reasons: The legislation is clear and also the CRA position is reflected in paragraph 22(e) of IT-337R4.

17 June 2008 External T.I. 2007-0225911E5 - Designated Inv. Services/ Qualified Investments

Unedited CRA Tags
115.2

Principal Issues: (1) What are the consequences if an investment held for a non-resident investor by a Canadian service provider ceases to be a "qualified investment" but where, prior to such change, the investment was a "qualified investment"?

Position: (1) Generally, when one of the investments held by a Canadian service provider ceases to be a qualified investment the income derived from the Canadian business of the non-resident will not be protected by the safe harbour rule in subsection 115.2(2). However, where a particular investment has ceased to be a "qualified investment" we will allow a Canadian service provider a grace period of 15 days to recognize this fact and dispose of the property before subsection 115.2(2) would cease to have application.

Reasons: (1) Reading of 115.2(2) and administrative position.

4 June 2008 External T.I. 2008-0271331E5 - Principal Residence Exemption-Houseboat

Unedited CRA Tags
40(2)(b) 54

Principal Issues: Is the principal residence exemption available in respect of waterfront property that is land, where a taxpayer resides in a principal residence that is a houseboat.

Position: No.

Reasons: A houseboat that rests upon water does not have identifiable subjacent or contiguous land due to the essence of its mobility.

6 March 2008 External T.I. 2007-0256141E5 - RCAs and Life Insurance Policies

Unedited CRA Tags
207.6

Principal Issues: How the RCA rules apply to life insurance policies acquired as a means of funding a plan or arrangement to provide retirement benefits.

Position: General comments provided.

2007-025614
XXXXXXXXXX Bruce Hartt
(613) 948-5273
March 6, 2008

3 March 2008 External T.I. 2007-0243611E5 - Contributions to U.K.Pension Plan

Unedited CRA Tags
147.2(4)

Principal Issues: A Canadian resident, originally from the U.K., wants to make additional contributions to their U.K. pension plan to increase the U.K. pension they will receive when they retire. 1) Can they deduct the contributions when computing their Canadian income taxes? 2) When they do retire, are they required to include the amounts received from their U.K. pension when computing their Canadian income taxes?

Position: 1) No. 2) Yes.

Reasons: There is no provision under the Act that provides for a deduction. Furthermore, there is no relief provided under the Canada-U.K. Convention.

2007-024361
XXXXXXXXXX Bruce Hartt
(613) 948-5273
March 3, 2008

10 June 2007 External T.I. 2008-0273681E5 - Pension income amount and PARs/ RRSP withdrawals.

Unedited CRA Tags
118(7) 146 8304.1 8301

Principal Issues: 1) Whether income received by an individual under the age of 65 out of a RRIF is eligible for the pension tax credit. 2) Whether there is a mechanism similar to the PAR, recreating contribution room, where amounts are withdrawn from an RRSP.

Position: 1) No. 2) No.

Reasons: 1) Amounts received out of a RRIF by an individual under the age of 65 are not "qualified pension income" under the Income Tax Act unless received as a result of the death of the individual's spouse or common law partner. 2) No such law exists.

2008-027368
XXXXXXXXXX Mike Thomson
(613) 957-3496
June 10, 2008

Technical Interpretation - Internal

24 June 2008 Internal T.I. 2008-0275451I7 - Conversion of farm land to inventory

Unedited CRA Tags
9(1) 39 54 248(1)

Principal Issues: Whether the farm land was converted from capital property to inventory.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: IT-218R, paragraphs 5, 23 and 24, and case law.