Income Tax Severed Letters - 2001-01-05

Miscellaneous

2000 2000-0048741 - XXXXXXXXXX - Change in facts

Unedited CRA Tags
55(2)

Principal Issues: Slight change in facts and rulings.

Position: Granted with some exceptions.

Reasons: The law.

2000 2000-0050431 - RETIREMENT BENEFITS

Unedited CRA Tags
5 6 115

Principal Issues: Whether changes to the facts and proposed transactions will affect the ruling given.

Position: No.

Reasons: The changes have no impact on the ruling given.

Ruling

22 December 2000 Ruling 2000-0060203 - STOCK OPTION VERBAL AGREEMENT

Unedited CRA Tags
7(1)

Principal Issues: Can we rule on the acquisition of shares by an employee under a verbal stock option agreement entered into in XXXXXXXXXX ?

Position: No.

Reasons: The proposed acquisition of shares under the existing verbal agreement is a completed transaction since the agreement was entered into in XXXXXXXXXX .

2000 Ruling 1999-0010723 - sequential butterfly reorganizations

Unedited CRA Tags
55(2) 55(3)(b)

Principal Issues:

1. Whether the deferred taxes in respect of a property to be transferred pursuant to a subsection 85(1) election in the course of a butterfly reorganization are relevant for purposes of valuing the property to be transferred ?

2. Whether the proposed sale of a property by DC to TC as part of the series which includes the proposed transactions, where such sale occurs immediately after the butterfly reorganization, will be part of the distribution, even though such sale will comply with the rules set out in paragraph 55(3.1)(d) ?

3. Whether the proposed reallocation of the mortgage balances in respect of two of its properties will result in an acquisition of property by DC in contemplation of the distribution when both properties are properties of the same type for purposes of the distribution ?

4. TC previously transferred a subject property to DC and received DC non-voting preferred shares as consideration. DC now proposes to reconvey the subject property back to TC for purposes of a distribution by DC and to add a voting right to each of its non-voting preferred shares held by TC such that DC will be connected with TC for purposed of Part IV tax. As Part IV tax provisions do not contain anti-avoidance rules similar to subsection 191(3), whether the proposed addition of the voting right to the DC non-voting preferred shares will be subject to the application of the subsection 245(2) ?

5. Whether the addition of a voting right to a particular class of preferred shares of DC will constitute a disposition of such shares ?

Position:

1. No.

2. Yes.

3. Provided that such increase and decrease in the mortgage balances will not result in any change to the aggregate principal amount owing under such mortgages and will not result in any significant change to the aggregate current portion of the amount owing by DC under the two mortgages, it will not result in an acquisition of property.

4. No.

5. Provided that the addition of the voting right to the particular class of preferred shares of DC will not result in an acquisition of control of DC by the holder of the particular class of preferred shares of DC, the answer is no.

Reasons:

2000 Ruling 2000-0043903 - BORROWING TO PAY A DIVIDEND

Unedited CRA Tags
20(1)(c)

Principal Issues: Deductibility of interest on funds borrowed to pay dividends.

Position: Okay.

Reasons: Satisfies the retained earnings test.

2000 Ruling 2000-0053203 - STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT

Unedited CRA Tags
56(1)(a) 12.2

Principal Issues:

An individual (the Claimant ) sustained personal injuries when XXXXXXXXXX was involved in a motor vehicle accident. The individual and XXXXXXXXXX Guardian commenced an action against the other driver. Pursuant to a court settlement, the defendants' insurers will agree to make periodic payments to the Claimant and if the Claimant dies within the XXXXXXXXXX year guarantee period, to the Claimant's estate.

The issue is the income tax treatment of the periodic payments.

2000 Ruling 2000-0058563 - XXXXXXXXXX

Unedited CRA Tags
149(1)(d)

Principal Issues: Minor change to facts

Position: OK

Reasons: No impact on rulings

2000 Ruling 2000-0028843 - payments to retirees for forgone medi. bene.

Unedited CRA Tags
6(1)(9) 3 56

Principal Issues: Whether payments made by the taxpayer to retired employees and/or their families for foregone benefits in respect of life insurance and medical benefits are taxable. These benefits were discontinued as a result of financial difficulties.

Position: No.

Reasons: The payment will not be considered income pursuant to section 3, section 5, section 6 or section 56, nor will such amount constitute proceeds of disposition, as defined in section 54.

2000 Ruling 2000-0033793 - Butterfly Reorganization

Unedited CRA Tags
55(3)(b)

Principal Issues: Characterization of farm residences as business property; application of paragraph 85(1)(b) where liabilities of the distributing corporation exceed the aggregate cost amount of the distributed properties.

Position: Residences treated as business property on the basis that they were occupied by employees of the distributing corporation. We permitted liabilities in excess of the cost of the distributed properties to be assumed by the transferee corporations as part consideration for the redemption of preferred shares issued to the distributing corporation.

Reasons: IT-268R3, paragraph 15 states that it is always a question of fact whether a particular property is used in a farming business; assumption of excess liabilities in the manner described herein conforms to CCRA policy as confirmed in Q.7, 1996 CMTC.

2000 Ruling 1999-0008753 F - DEBENTURES ECHANGEABLES

Unedited CRA Tags
20(1)(c) 20(1)(e) 20(1)(f) 49

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.

Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

Principales Questions

1. Les fonds reçus de l'émission des débentures sont-ils considérés de l'argent emprunté pour l'application du sous-alinéa 20(1)c)(ii) de la Loi?

2000 Ruling 2000-0042703 F - OSBL DEVIENT IMPOSABLE

Unedited CRA Tags
149(10) 89(1)

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.

Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

Principales Questions

1. À quel moment la société cesse-t-elle d'être exemptée d'impôt en vertu de l'alinéa 149(1)l) de la Loi et quel est le "moment donné" pour les fins du paragraphe 149(10) de la Loi?

1999 Ruling 9803933 - 55(3)(A) REORGANIZATION

Unedited CRA Tags
55(3)(a)

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.

Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

XXXXXXXXXX 980393

XXXXXXXXXX, 1999

Dear Sir:

Re: XXXXXXXXXX
Advance Income Tax Ruling

1999 Ruling 9931613 - AMENDMENT TO PROPOSED DSUP PLAN

Unedited CRA Tags
REG 6801(d)

Principal Issues: Will we accept the amendments to the phantom stock plan (ruling 992246) which will be implemented XXXXXXXXXX?

Position: Yes

Reasons: 6801(d) satisfied.

Ministerial Correspondence

18 December 2000 Ministerial Correspondence 2000-0056754 F - DON ET CONTREPARTIE PARTIELLE

Unedited CRA Tags
118.1

Position Adoptée:
Aucune. La question est présentement sous étude.

5 December 2000 Ministerial Correspondence 2000-0055044 - EXPENSES AT SPECIAL & REMOTE SITES

Unedited CRA Tags
6(6) 8

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.

Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

December 5, 2000

XXXXXXXXXX

Dear XXXXXXXXXX:

The Honourable Martin Cauchon, Minister of National Revenue, has asked me to respond to your letter of September 28, 2000, concerning travel and accommodation expenses of employees working in the construction industry.

1 December 2000 Ministerial Correspondence 2000-0047564 - REREGISTRATION OF SHARES-JOINT TENANCY

Unedited CRA Tags
54

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.

Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

December 1, 2000

XXXXXXXXXX

Dear XXXXXXXXXX:

29 November 2000 Ministerial Correspondence 2000-0054614 - MOVING EXP.-IMMIGRANTS

Unedited CRA Tags
62

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.

Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

November 29, 2000

The Honourable Jane Stewart, P.C., M.P.

Minister of Human Resources Development
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
KiA 0A6

Dear Colleague:

15 November 2000 Ministerial Correspondence 2000-0050674 - FISHING PROGRAMS-OAS GIS

Unedited CRA Tags
56(1)(a)

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.

Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

November 15, 2000

XXXXXXXXXX

Dear XXXXXXXXXX:

The Honourable Martin Cauchon, Minister of National Revenue, has asked me to reply to your letter received on September 29, 2000, concerning your entitlement to the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS).

Technical Interpretation - External

29 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0041805 - CERTIFIGIFT DONATIONS

Unedited CRA Tags
118.1

Principal Issues: Follow-up to 2000-002628

Position: Confirmed previous position

Reasons: No change in proposal or new arguments

21 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0062015 - Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Act

Unedited CRA Tags
96

Principal Issues:

What is the status for Canadian income tax purposes of an entity governed by the Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Act (the "DRUPA") ?

Position:

Precision to indicate that the opinion previously given as to the status of those entities concerns the entities governed by the DRUPA that carry on business with a view to profit.

Reasons:

20 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0056585 - TAXING OF RRSP PROCEEDS ON DEATH

Unedited CRA Tags
146(1) 146(8.8)

Principal Issues: What are the tax consequences and who is taxed when an annuitant of a matured RRSP dies

Position: Gave general positions. It is dependent on whether there is a surviving spouse.

Reasons: Based on provisions on RRSP

20 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0057745 - MEDICAL EXPENSES-TRAVEL & TRANS.

Unedited CRA Tags
118.2(g) 118.2(h)

Principal Issues:

20 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0043725 - Unrelated Persons

Unedited CRA Tags
55(5)

Principal Issues: Whether S is an unrelated person (within the meaning of paragraph 55(3.01)(a)) in respect of Jcorp.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The provisions of subparagraphs 55(5)(e)(ii) and (iii) would suggest that for the purposes of section 55 of the Act, a reference to a trust should be a reference to the trust as a person and not the trustees personally.

19 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0035685 F - RPA TRANSFER AU DECES

Unedited CRA Tags
147.3(7) 252(4)

Principales Questions:

1. Est-ce que l'expression "ancien conjoint" au paragraphe 147.3(7) inclut un ancien conjoint de fait?
2. Est-ce que le mot "ou" dans l'expression "le conjoint ou l'ancien conjoint" au paragraphe 147.3(7) est exclusif ou inclusif?

Position Adoptée:

19 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0049705 - day trader

Unedited CRA Tags
9(1) 85(1)

Principal Issues:
Does a trader who incorporates his business qualify for the small business deduction?

19 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0055065 - Death of a Spouse - Matrimonial Regime

Unedited CRA Tags
248(22) 248(23.1) 70(6) 70(5)

Principal Issues:

A capital property could be the subject of a partition as a consequence of the dissolution of a matrimonial regime created under the civil law in Quebec . One of the spouses dies. What are the fiscal consequences for the deceased spouse and the surviving spouse upon the dissolution of the matrimonial regime? Is the estate taxable on the income from the property and on the capital gain realized?

Position:

General comments.

Reasons:

18 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0041105 - WHAT IS A "VALID ELECTION"

Unedited CRA Tags
50(1)

Principal Issues:

Whether the write down for accounting purposes (as was reflected on the financial statements attached to the corporate income tax return) constitutes a valid election for purposes of subsection 50(1) of the Act?

Position TAKEN:

No.

Reasons:

18 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0050255 - CHANGE IN TERMS OF DEBT OBLIGATION

Unedited CRA Tags
54
disposition if implied rescission due to fundamental change going to root of contract

Principal Issues: Whether a change in the terms of a debt obligation would result in the disposition of original obligation and the creation of a new one.

Position: Question of fact

Reasons: The determination of whether a change in the terms of a debt obligation is a substitution of a debt obligation for another should be made in accordance with the law of the relevant jurisdiction. In the common law jurisdictions, a rescission of a debt obligation will be implied when the parties have effected such an alteration of its terms so as to substitute a new obligation in its place, which is entirely inconsistent with the old obligation or if not entirely inconsistent, inconsistent with it to an extent that goes to the very root of it.

18 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0022325 - EMPLOYER PROVIDED COMPUTERS

Unedited CRA Tags
6(1)(a)

Principal Issues: Whether provision of computers to administrative officers using professional development funds results in taxable employment benefit.

Position: No position taken

Reasons: Issue is under consideration by TSO

18 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0046045 - clergy residence deduct-music ministry

Unedited CRA Tags
8(1)(c)

Principal Issues:

Taxpayer attached a copy of a brief job description entitled "Director of Music" and asked for our opinion on whether the person filling this position would qualify for the clergy residence deduction.

Position TAKEN:

General comments provided only. Referred them to IT-141R and the comments pertaining to specialized ministries.

Reasons:

18 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0030175 - Carry Forward Losses Loss Business Ceased

Unedited CRA Tags
111(5)(a)

Principal Issues: Whether non-capital losses of Targetco are available to Amalco?

Position: It is a question of fact.

Reasons: The availability of the non-capital losses will depend on whether the business that sustained those losses was still being carried on.

15 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0042945 - INTERACTION OF SECTIONS OF THE ACT69(11)

Unedited CRA Tags
73(3) 251.1

Principal Issues:

Where subsections 73(3) or (4) are first used to transfer (on a rollover basis) farm property to an adult child (e.g. to get multiple use of the capital gains exemption) and the farm property is then sold within a three year period, does subsection 69(11) apply?

Position TAKEN:

Yes.

Reasons:

14 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0046925 - Film Tax Credits

Unedited CRA Tags
125.4 125.5

Principal Issues:

Whether sub-contracted labour expenditures would qualify for the film or video production tax credit and the film or video production services tax credit for the purposes of section 125.4 and 125.5 of the Act.

Position:

Generally, such expenditures do not qualify. However, on an administrative basis, such expenditures will be allowed to qualify as labour expenditure of a qualified corporation in the manner and to the extent provided in the definition of "labour expenditure" and provided that there is no double billing by subcontractors.

This position will also apply in respect of the definition of "Canadian labour expenditure" under subsection 125.5(1)

Reasons:

6 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0056265 - GAAP AND LCT

Unedited CRA Tags
181(3)

Principal Issues:
1. Whether financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP should be used for LCT purposes.
2. Whether a taxpayer is entitled to choose between alternative accounting treatments for LCT purposes.
3. Whether CCRA should consider adopting a rule to not challenge audited and certified GAAP financial statements for LCT purposes.

Position:
1. Yes, however paragraph 181(3)(a) prohibits the use of the equity and consolidation methods of accounting.
2. Yes, provided that GAAP permits alternative accounting treatments.
3. As a general rule, CCRA will accept audited and certified GAAP statements but this does not necessarily mean that such financial statements will be accepted without question in all cases.

Reasons:
1. Subsection 181(3).
2. Previous opinions.
3. CCRA may question audited and certified financial statements if there is reason to believe that a particular accounting treatment is not in accordance with GAAP.

6 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0056275 - LEVERAGED BUYOUTS

Unedited CRA Tags
20(1)(c)

Principal Issues: What affect does the decision in the CRB Logging case have on our loss utilization positions?

Position: None

Reasons: We would not have ruled favourably on the CRB Logging scenario thus no changes are required.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

21 December 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0052357 - RRSP CONSULTATION SESSION

Unedited CRA Tags
146.1 206(2) REG 5000(1.1) REG 3201

Principal Issues:
1) Can an RESP loan property to the subscriber?
2) Can "debit interest" be charged to an RRSP?
3) Are the stock exchanges listed in the Department of Finance's news release dated July 22, 1998 now law?
4) Are "designated limited partnerships" considered foreign property for purposes of subsection 206(2) of the Act?
5) Is the writing of an option a qualified investment for purposes of an RRSP trust?
6) Will a foreign share become non-qualified if it is delisted from a prescribed stock exchange.
7) What happened to the proposal to include foreign currency in the list of qualified investments for an RRSP trust when the election was called.

Position:
1) No.
2) Possibly, but there may be adverse tax consequences resulting from the overdraft.
3) Not yet..
4) No.
5) The rules regarding qualified investments are not relevant to writing options.
6) Generally, yes.
7) The proposal was not introduced as a bill prior to the election call.

Reasons:
1) The RESP will be immediately revoked.
2) Subsection 146(4) or 146(10) will apply if the RRSP trust borrows money or any property of the RRSP trust is used as security for a loan.
3) The regulation was pre-published in Part I of the Canada Gazette on December 9, 2000..
4) Paragraph 5000(1.1)(e) was passed on May 18, 2000.
5) No property is acquired, so whether or not the property is a qualified investment is not relevant to writing options.
6) Unless it is qualified by some other provision, if it is no longer listed on a prescribed stock exchange, it is no longer a qualified investment for an RRSP trust.
7) The Department of Finance had invited the public to comment on the legislation.

19 December 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0054467 F - VALEUR DU DON D'UNE POLICE D'ASSURANCE

Unedited CRA Tags
118.1

Principales Questions: Est-ce que la valeur actualisée du capital assuré est le montant du don de bienfaisance ?

Position Adoptée: Non

19 December 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0049197 F - DEDUCTIBILITE DES INTERETS

Unedited CRA Tags
20(1)(c) 9(3)

Principales Questions: Déductibilité des intérêts sur emprunt utilisé pour acquérir des unités de fonds mutuels

Position Adoptée: Position générale de l'Agence

19 December 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0009277 F - Fosse pour traitement du fumier

Unedited CRA Tags
20(1)(a) 30

Principales Questions:
1. Quel est le traitement fiscal des dépenses relatives à la fosse (plate-forme, purot et descente) autre que l'installation du système de drainage?
2. Quelle est la catégorie dans laquelle devrait être classée la fosse ?

Position Adoptée:
1. Nous sommes d'avis qu'il faudrait privilégier l'alternative de considérer les dépenses comme étant des dépenses en capital qui sont des biens amortissables d'une catégorie prescrite plutôt que considérer ces dépenses en capital comme faisant partie du coût du terrain.
2. Le coût des composantes et des travaux, comme l'excavation, reliés à la fosse (plate-forme, purot et descente) serait une structure et ferait partie de l'alinéa q) de la catégorie 1.

19 December 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0060077 - ELECTION AND INTEREST DEDUCTION

Unedited CRA Tags
39(4) 20(1)(c) 20.1(1)

Principal Issues:
Subsection 39(4), interest deduction

15 December 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0052397 F - PRESTATIONS RETROACTIVES DE LA CSST

Unedited CRA Tags
56(1)v) 110(1)f)(ii)

Principales Questions:

1. Est-ce que des indemnités de décès versées par la CSST à une mère en vertu d'un droit que possède son enfant mineur doivent être incluses dans le revenu de la mère ou dans celui de l'enfant ?

2. Étant donné que les prestations de XXXXXXXXXX $ reçues en XXXXXXXXXX visaient la période du
XXXXXXXXXX , est-ce que ces sommes peuvent être réparties sur les années en question ?

Position Adoptée:

14 December 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0034037 - safe income

Unedited CRA Tags
55(2) 55(5)

Principal Issues: Calculation of safe income

Position: Pre-acquisition losses did not reduce the safe income of the corporation acquiring the shares of the loss corporation

Reasons: See below
December 14, 2000

12 December 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0036467 - AMT AND NET CAPITAL LOSSES

Unedited CRA Tags
127.52(1)(i) 111(1)(b)

Principal Issues:
Taxpayer incurred a net capital loss in 1998 and wishes to carry back a portion to 1995. Can the taxpayer carry back a different portion of the loss for alternative minimum tax purposes than for regular Part I tax purposes?

6 December 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0058067 - SHARECROPPIG-RENTAL OR FARMING INCOME

Unedited CRA Tags
9(1)

Principal Issues: Whether a landlord who, in addition to providing the farmland, is also involved in raising crops on the land, should report his share of the crops as rental income or farming income.

Position: Likely farming.

Reasons: Since the taxpayer pays for the fuel for the tractor and helps his father raise the crops, his involvement appears to go beyond that of a typical landlord in a sharecropping arrangement
December 6, 2000

30 November 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0049177 - NON-PROFIT STATUS

Unedited CRA Tags
149(1)(l)

Principal Issues: Whether XXXXXXXXXX qualifies as a NPO.

Position: Organized as a NPO but unable to determine if operated as such

Reasons: Determination of operation of NPO is responsibility of TSO

24 November 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0050967 - DEDUCTION OF VEH. EXP.

Unedited CRA Tags
8(1)(h.1) 6(1)(b)

Principal Issues: Whether employees who receive a combination vehicle allowance consisting of a flat rate and a per kilometre rate can deduct vehicle expenses under paragraph 8(1)(h.1) without including the total of the combination allowance in income.

Position: No. Further, where an employee receives a motor vehicle allowance consisting of a per kilometre amount and a flat-rate amount, it is our view that the combined allowance will be deemed not to be a reasonable allowance pursuant to subparagraph 6(1)(b)(x) of the Act, since it is not based solely on the number of kilometres driven for employment-related purposes. However, the "Employer's Guide Taxable Benefits 1999-2000" states differently.

Reasons: Under paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Act, an employee who receives a motor vehicle allowance is not permitted to deduct motor vehicle expenses under paragraph 8(1)(h.1) of the Act unless the allowance has been included in income

22 November 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0036517 - RETIRING ALLOWANCE - REIM. OF COSTS

Unedited CRA Tags
60(j.1)

Principal Issues: Will an amount paid as a result of a taxpayer's loss of office be received tax free because the taxpayer is under the impression that the amount represented a reimbursement of his costs incurred to fight the case?

Position: No.

Reasons: The taxpayer has not provided any proof to substantiate his claim that the amount was not received in respect of his loss of office or employment.

8 November 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0054517 - ILLEGAL PAYMENTS

Unedited CRA Tags
67.5(1)

Principal Issues: Whether subsection 67.5(1) of the Act applies to deny the deduction of certain payments made in 1998 and 1999.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: Subsection 67.5(1) of the Act denies the deduction of an outlay or expense incurred for the purposes of doing anything that is an offence under, amongst others, section 426 of the Criminal Code.

31 October 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0051337 - software engineering OETC

Unedited CRA Tags
122.3

Principal Issues: Meaning of "software engineering".
Also, whether such activity is an "engineering activity" for purposes of OETC in section 122.3.

Position: Meaning of "software engineering" is found in TCC decision Gabie v. Canada (1998 T.C.J. No. 974) and in paragraph 6.10(f) of IC-86-4R3.
Software engineering qualifies as an engineering activity in clause 122.3(1)(b)(i) of the Act for purposes of the OETC.

Reasons: n/a
Oct. 31, 2000
G. Middleton
Memo to file # 2000-005133

14 September 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0035797 F - ALLOCATION DE SEJOUR

Unedited CRA Tags
6(1)a) 6(1)b) 6(6)

Principales Questions : déterminer si une allocation versée en vertu d'un programme de stage est admissible au traitement fiscal du sous-alinéa 6(1)b)(iii).

Position Adoptée : peut-être pour une partie de l'allocation, si les faits supportent notre interprétation.